http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/06/arts/design/06prin.html
the most important part of this article is “there’s not a pixel, there’s not a grain that’s different,”
there is no fine line here. if the photographer sold his copyright, then malboro should/could be after money. if he owns the copyright, it's his fucking photo. it's called bootlegging. there is no spin you can put on it. if you sell my pic for 300 grand and disagree to giving me 50%, you get dead.
No comments:
Post a Comment